Gold$2,345.67/oz+0.82%
Silver$29.42/oz-0.34%
Copper$4.12/lb+1.15%
Uranium$85.50/lb+2.41%
Lithium (SC6)$1,240/t-1.08%
TSX-V$1,024.3+0.56%
Gold$2,345.67/oz+0.82%
Silver$29.42/oz-0.34%
Copper$4.12/lb+1.15%
Uranium$85.50/lb+2.41%
Lithium (SC6)$1,240/t-1.08%
TSX-V$1,024.3+0.56%

Grade, Tonnage & Scale

How Much Metal, in How Much Rock?

Why a little metal over a lot of rock can still add up to a real mine.

Key Takeaways
  • Grade measures concentration; tonnage measures the amount of material. You need both.
  • A large, lower-grade deposit can contain more metal than a small, higher-grade one.
  • Contained metal is not the same as recoverable metal, revenue or profit.
  • Mining costs, processing recovery and the deposit’s shape decide whether scale is useful.
  • Compare deposits using consistent units, cut-off assumptions and resource categories.

Concentration and Quantity

Grade tells you how much metal is present in a given amount of rock. Tonnage tells you how much rock has been estimated. Together, they help describe a deposit’s metal content.

Picture two bowls of soup. One is small and packed with vegetables; the other is much larger but less concentrated. Concentration alone cannot tell you which bowl contains more vegetables. Mining has the same distinction between grade and scale.

A Simple Gold Example

Deposit A: 10 million tonnes at 1 g/t
Suppose a hypothetical deposit contains 10 million tonnes of material averaging 1 gram of gold per tonne. Multiplying tonnage by grade gives 10 million grams of contained gold. Dividing by approximately 31.1035 grams per troy ounce gives about 321,500 ounces.
Deposit B: 1 million tonnes at 5 g/t
A second deposit with 1 million tonnes at 5 g/t contains about 160,750 ounces. Its grade is five times higher, but its contained gold is only half as large.

These calculations describe metal content only. They say nothing about whether either deposit can become a profitable mine.

The Metal You Can Actually Recover

Some material may never enter the mine plan. Some metal is lost during mining and processing. Metallurgical recovery is the share recovered by the proposed processing method; it depends on the mineralogy and test work.

In a deliberately simplified example, processing material containing 100 ounces at 90% recovery would recover 90 ounces. That still leaves operating costs, capital spending and other charges before any profit reaches shareholders.

Multiplying every contained ounce by today’s metal price does not produce a company valuation.

It ignores the work, time, money and losses involved in extraction.

Why Low Grade Can Sometimes Work

A broad deposit near the surface may suit large equipment and high processing volumes. A narrow deposit deep underground may need more selective and expensive mining. This is why the same grade can be attractive in one setting and insufficient in another.

Scale can spread certain fixed costs across more tonnes, but it can also require a larger plant, more power, more water and a bigger construction budget. Bigger is helpful only when the plan can turn that size into worthwhile margins.

Questions to Ask Before Comparing

Are both figures in the same units and for the same commodity?
What cut-off grade or other economic threshold defines the reported material?
Are the estimates in the same confidence category and from comparable dates?
What mining method, processing recovery and infrastructure does each project require?
How much of the reported material is included in an actual mine plan?

A lower cut-off can bring more material into an estimate while reducing average grade. An increase in reported tonnes therefore needs explanation. Look for an improved economic picture, not just a larger headline number.

How to Read Drill Results

Next in the Mining 101 Series

Mineral Resources vs. Reserves

The difference between "it's there" and "we can actually mine it."

Continue →